• Jul : 6 : 2018 - Medical Alert-Connect Accused of Perpetuity Billing in Violation of Deceptive Business/Trade Practices Laws
  • Jun : 20 : 2018 - SLED investigating Cole’s Towing-IATD Interview WSPA
  • Jun : 17 : 2018 - Cole’s Towing owner, employee arrested for assault and battery
  • May : 19 : 2018 - Immigrant Children Separated from Families Will Be Put in Warehouses on Military Bases
  • May : 19 : 2018 - Cops Called on Documentary Filmmaker & Other Blacks Checking out of Airbnb

No one enjoys being duped, especially folks on a fixed income.  A Spartanburg area elderly person was drawn to Stanton Optical’s buy one get one free deal.  The ad, like most comes with restrictions that can only be found in the ‘fine print’.   Said senior was also told that the eye exam was free. It is not.  The cost of the 2 pair for $69 ballooned into $258.00.  We suspect some of the inflated cost for the second pair is to cover the eye exams.

Now, besides the false and very misleading statement ultimately used to draw also but we will discuss that later, we learn that very disturbing aforementioned red flags surfaced.  Consumer M. was sold glasses with very, very little medicine in them.

Let us first mention that in the end, “Consumer M” was sold two pair of eye glasses that the staff, expressly the Optometrist, knew would not benefit ‘Consumer M’.

A second eye doctor unrelated to  Stanton revealed that Consumer M, had protein deposits to build up on both of her eyes, one more than the next, but this significantly impacted her vision.  Instead of Stanton explaining to Consumer M. that her vision would only worsen due to the pile up, that glasses would not benefit her.  Stanton’s staff later on admitted that there was very, very little medicine in the $258 eyeglasses.

Regarding the dicy advertisement of a free eye exam. That is indeed false. The eye exam is not free.  It is paid upfront by the customer, then supposedly deducted from the cost of the eyeglasses is paid by the consumer upfront.  Though that amount is listed as $45.00, Stanton’s staff explains that it is free in that after the initial $45.00 is paid, the same $45.00 is then taken off of the price of the glass on the back end.  Still, Consumer M also had medicare which Stanton billed them for a whopping amount of $300 plus, using insurance billing.

A member of IATD contacted Stanton about the consumer’s experience and was informed that they do not offer refunds.  Well, well, well. That bit of information was not disclosed to the consumer before hand, and especially not in a conspicuous way so of course the customer had a problem with owning two pair useless glasses on top of being charged far more than the two (2) for $69.00.

The consumer was then informed that she would have to wait 7 to 10 days for a check to come in the mail from Stanton’s corporate offices. That of course is unacceptable. As a retail company, Stanton’s refund policy should align with the norm in that a refund in the manner of which the item was purchased should occur.

After some discussion, Stanton did provide a quicker solution to the consumer in that a refund was placed back on her card, one that she hadn’t use for the purchase.  We waited a certain bit of time to ensure the refund was given.  The consumer contact us on yesterday to let us know she was refunded via her credit card.

Yet, the problem remains, Staton is willing to sell useless glasses to unsuspecting consumers, especially those who are most vulnerable to such consumer shenanigans as what Stanton was comfortable in doing. We must now wonder how many other seniors on a fixed income have been taken advantage in this instance.  If you are unable to see out of your glasses once they come in, please document it when you share your inability to see out of the prescribed lens.

Also, if your $45.00 co pay is billed to your insurance company please ask for a copy of the actual amount your insurance company is actually billed.

RESOLVED

IATD

Consumer grief.

 

 

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Featured Video

Dialing 911 Tantamount...

Posted on Jul - 22 - 2017

0 Comment

Tow Truck Company, “Almighty...

Posted on May - 3 - 2015

0 Comment

IATD Helps Tenant Get...

Posted on Apr - 28 - 2015

0 Comment

Victory for The Pattersons...

Posted on Mar - 22 - 2015

0 Comment

IATD Resolves Housing Issue...

Posted on May - 2 - 2014

0 Comment

IATD POST PRESS CONFERENCE...

Posted on Feb - 22 - 2014

0 Comment

SLED investigating big rig...

Posted on Jun - 26 - 2018

0 Comment

Dual SLED Investigations into...

Posted on Jun - 20 - 2018

0 Comment

Cole’s Towing owner, employee...

Posted on Jun - 17 - 2018

0 Comment

Dialing 911 Tantamount...

Posted on Jul - 22 - 2017

0 Comment

Tow Truck Company, “Almighty...

Posted on May - 3 - 2015

0 Comment

IATD Helps Tenant Get...

Posted on Apr - 28 - 2015

0 Comment

Victory for The Pattersons...

Posted on Mar - 22 - 2015

0 Comment

IATD Resolves Housing Issue...

Posted on May - 2 - 2014

0 Comment

IATD POST PRESS CONFERENCE...

Posted on Feb - 22 - 2014

0 Comment

PROTEST today at Spartanburg...

Posted on Aug - 17 - 2017

0 Comment

SLED investigating big rig...

Posted on Jun - 26 - 2018

0 Comment

Michigan governor Rick Snyder...

Posted on Apr - 6 - 2016

0 Comment

Twitter updates

No public Twitter messages.

Sponsors

  • Reliable web hosting from WebHostingHub.com.
  • Domain name search and availability check by PCNames.com.
  • Website and logo design contests at DesignContest.com.
  • Reviews of the best cheap web hosting providers at WebHostingRating.com.